• Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Call Toll Free 1-866-570-8585

Find An Office Near You
Speak With an Internet Lawyer Now
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

White House Launches Social Media Censorship and Bias Reporting Tool

White House Launches Social Media Censorship and Bias Reporting Tool

May 29, 2019 Posted by Raees Mohamed Defamation, Cyberbullying, Internet Law, Social Media Law No Comments

A week after Facebook announced it is banning extremist commentators from using their platform, the White House launched a new Tool for people who feel they’ve been wrongly censored, suspended, or banned from social media platforms.

[SEE: Social Media Censorship: The Pros And Cons Of Banning Extremist Speech]

The tool is hosted on Typeform, a Barcelona-based online software company that companies like Nike and Apple Inc. have used for online surveys and form building. It seems to be named the “Tech Bias Story Sharing Tool” when you look at the title of the web page.

When you first enter the website, all you see is a statement that reads, “SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS should advance FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Yet too many Americans have seen their accounts suspended, banned, or fraudulently reported for unclear “violations” of user policies. No matter your views, if you suspect political bias caused such an action to be taken against you, share your story with President Trump.” Following this is a start button that leads to a form with various questions, one of which asks if you are a U.S. citizen or permanent resident.

It’s no secret that President Trump has many issues with social media and the type of rules these companies employ. However, when it comes to freedom of speech, most are unaware that those First Amendment protections do not necessarily apply to social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. because these companies are private. In other words, the United States government has no control over what rules social media abides by. If Facebook wants to remove users from their platform, they have every right to do so. They could even remove the President if they wanted to.

However, it seems like those in charge intend to do good by implementing new rules, despite public outcry that conservatives have been wrongly censored on social media. Facebook’s motivation for banning extremist users was to reduce the influence the social network has on mass shootings and violent attacks.

[SEE: Social Media Used A Weapon]

Still, in recent months, Republicans have been publicly addressing their concerns that social media networks are censoring conservatives. Even going so far as to question officials from Facebook and Twitter about political bias during hearings held by committees like the House Energy and Senate Judiciary, according to The Verge.

“We enforce the Twitter Rules impartially for all users, regardless of their background or political affiliation. We are constantly working to improve our systems and will continue to be transparent in our efforts,” said Twitter in a response to the new tool in a quote published by The Verge.

The tool has users describe what actions were taken against their account, identify which platform took action (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, other), and also allows for screenshots and links to be attached.

One of the last questions of the form reads is, “One more thing, just to confirm you aren’t a robot. The Declaration of Independence was signed in what year?”

This is an anti-scripting technique that The Verge describes as “Unorthodox” and “generally ineffective” because of how simple it is to type in a number. Other anti-scripting tools use photo recognition to determine if someone is a robot or not. Not sure if the White House meant this to be a joke or not, but it’s kind of funny.

What’s also interesting about this whole situation is that President Trump, in a way, is guilty of social media censorship himself. When he blocks someone on Twitter, oftentimes because of their opposing viewpoints, he is censoring them from viewing his tweets and censoring the conversation around his tweets. In fact, this very specific case was taken to court, but Trump was not actually found guilty of violating First Amendment rights. This is because he blocked the user on his personal twitter account (not the government’s account) so therefore it’s not considered government censorship. Is that kind of hypocritical?

[SEE: Free Speech Vs. Government Censorship]  

If you need guidance on Internet defamation, cyberbullying, or free speech issues on social media, Contact the attorneys at RM Warner Law or visit RMWarnerLaw.Com to learn more.

Source: Https://Www.Theverge.Com/2019/5/15/18626785/White-House-Trump-Censorsip-Tool-Twitter-Instagram-Facebook-Conservative-Bias-Social-Media

Tags: cyberbullyingdefamationfree speechinternet lawsocial media censorshipsocial media lawsocial media lawyer
No Comments
0
Share

About Raees Mohamed

Raees is a Founding Partner at RM Warner PLC, a corporate and Internet Law firm that caters to startups and entrepreneurs. He is also an adjunct professor of law in the acclaimed Innovation Advancement Program legal clinic at the Sandra Day O’Connor College Of Law in Phoenix. There, he teaches law students how to counsel local entrepreneurs as Rule 39 certified student-practitioners. Raees believes the push for the advancement of innovation and a culture of entrepreneurship should come from academic institutions.

You also might be interested in

Ariana Grande Paparazzi Lawsuit: Should Celebrities Have The Right to Post Photos of Themselves Without Permission?

Ariana Grande Paparazzi Lawsuit: Should Celebrities Have The Right to Post Photos of Themselves Without Permission?

May 27, 2019

Ariana Grande is the latest celebrity being sued by a[...]

Fake Reviews: Top Ten Things Marketers Need To Know

Fake Reviews: Top Ten Things Marketers Need To Know

Sep 27, 2019

Are you a marketing or public relations professional seeking to[...]

FTC Legal Advertising Guidelines for Social Media Influencers

FTC Legal Advertising Guidelines for Social Media Influencers

Nov 15, 2019

Are you a social media influencer that promotes products on[...]

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
  • Cardi B Tattoo Trademark Trouble
  • Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Is Nothing But a “G” Thang: Soon-To-Be Ex-Wife Fights For the Intellectual Property Rights to His Name
  • Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes
  • Going Viral, Gone Bad: What Do You Do If Defamation Goes Viral?

Recent Comments

    Tag Cloud

    ad law advertising law airbnb amazon law amazon lawyer anonymous defamation business law business lawyer celebrity defamation corporate lawyer corporate takeover cyberbullying cyberbullying lawyer defamation defamation lawsuit defamation lawyer ecommerce ecommerce law ecommerce lawyer esports esports law esports lawsuit esports lawyer facebook facebook law facebook lawyer fake news fake reviews faze clan fba first amendment free speech influencer lawyer influencer marketing intellectual property internet law internet lawyer law day 2019 marketing law revenge porn sextortion shareholder dispute social media law social media lawyer twitter lawsuit

    Contact Us

    Send us a message and we'll get back to you, asap.

    Send Message
    Speak With An Internet Lawyer Today Call Now
    • RM Warner Law
    • 1-866-570-8585
    • 866-961-4984
    • admin@rmwarnerlaw.com

    Recent Posts

    • Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
    • Cardi B Tattoo Trademark Trouble
    • Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Is Nothing But a “G” Thang: Soon-To-Be Ex-Wife Fights For the Intellectual Property Rights to His Name
    • Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes
    Tweets by RMWarnerLaw1
    • RM Warner Instagram
    • Payments
    • Blog
    • Privacy Policy

    © 2020 — RM Warner Law

    • RM Warner Instagram
    • Payments
    • Blog
    • Privacy Policy
    Prev Next