Internet Law

Does Big Tech Need to Be Held Accountable?

Section 230 of The Communications Decency Act of 1996 protects tech companies from being held liable for content posted by users. If someone posts something illegal on social media, leading technology companies like Facebook and Twitter are not held responsible. However, thanks to U.S. Senator Josh Hawley, these laws may begin to change.

New Legislation Would Make Social Media Companies Liable for User Generated Content

It’s no secret that social media and the Internet have a huge impact on society. So much so, that elections and mass-shootings can be influenced by the power of Facebook and Twitter. 

[ SEE: Social Media Used As A Weapon ]

In fact, even the CEO of Facebook himself has asked governments to have a more active role in updating laws regarding the Internet, according to Mark Zuckerberg’s op-ed piece in The Washington Post. However, I’m not sure holding big tech accountable for the content users post is what he had in mind. 

According to Forbes, Josh Hawley’s proposal for new legislation would remove the immunity given to big tech companies under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. Instead, companies will need to submit audits biannually to the FTC that will prove their content-removal process and algorithms are politically-neutral in order to break free from their loss of protection. 

“With Section 230,” Hawley said in a statement published by Forbes, “tech companies get a sweetheart deal that no other industry enjoys—complete exemption from traditional publisher liability in exchange for providing a forum free of political censorship. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly, big tech has failed to hold up its end of the bargain.”

Interestingly enough, this proposal directly targets companies like Facebook and Twitter. This is because it would only apply to companies who have more than $500 million in global annual revenue or companies with more than 30 million active monthly users in the U.S. and 300 million globally, according to Forbes.

Those against this proposal believe that the protections under Section 230 allows people to freely express their views and opinions without fear of the government policing what can and cannot be said. Some also believe that politicians have underlying motives to making these types of changes.

Others, like Hawley, agree that Big Tech has become too powerful. Many would prefer to have the government policing content rather than having CEOs decide what can stay and what is removed. 

Thoughts on Section 230 From a Legal Perspective

“They couldn’t care less about small businesses who’ve been victimized by defamation and are left without any remedy, even though the problem is extremely  simple to solve: require websites to remove content when presented with a valid judgement and make the website liable for fees and costs when they fail to comply (similar to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ),” says Daniel Warner of RM Warner Law.

“It’s ridiculous that intellectual property rights in this country are valued more highly that one’s reputation.” Dan Warner emphasized that, “for many people in this country, a person’s ability to earn a living is determined by the individual’s ostensible reputation online.”  While Dan Warner agrees that Big Tech has become too powerful, “Section 230 is broken and has been broken for a very long time, but the problem is not just limited to ‘political speech’ and Big Tech. The law has been abused and will continue to be abused by people and companies big and small until it is changed. The fact that these companies can decide whether or not to honor a legitimate judgement from a court in the United States undermines our legal system and its utility, and encourages people to take matters in their own hands and/or engage in conduct that should not be encouraged in our society. If a judgement declares certain content to be defamatory and/or not protected speech, websites should be required to remove the content.” 

What do you think? Should Big Tech be held accountable or should the users be held accountable for the content they post?

What To Do If You’ve Been Defamed

If you are being defamed, cyberbullied, or threatened on social media or the Internet in general, contact the Internet attorneys at RM Warner Law. We can guide you through the path to justice. Get in touch today.

Raees Mohamed

Raees is a Founding Partner at RM Warner PLC, a corporate and Internet Law firm that caters to startups and entrepreneurs. He is also an adjunct professor of law in the acclaimed Innovation Advancement Program legal clinic at the Sandra Day O’Connor College Of Law in Phoenix. There, he teaches law students how to counsel local entrepreneurs as Rule 39 certified student-practitioners. Raees believes the push for the advancement of innovation and a culture of entrepreneurship should come from academic institutions.

Recent Posts

Defamation in the Digital Age: Legal Insights from RM Warner

On the internet, where perception is reality, defamation poses a significant threat to individuals and…

3 weeks ago

E-commerce Compliance: How RM Warner Ensures Legal Safety

The internet has opened up opportunities for business owners, marketers, influencers, and content creators alike.…

3 weeks ago

Is Sean Combs the Rap Industry Jeffrey Epstein?

How did Diddy get famous? Sean “Diddy” Combs started out as an ambitious radio station…

1 month ago

The Role of an E-commerce Lawyer in Today’s Digital Marketplace

These days, the rapid growth of online marketplaces means many entrepreneurs opt to use e-commerce…

1 month ago

Combatting Defamation: Legal Strategies from RM Warner

Reputation is everything in the business world. A single false statement or malicious rumor can…

1 month ago

Internet-Based Startups: Legal Best Practices with Insights from Internet Lawyers

Starting an online business can be exciting. As an e-commerce entrepreneur, you are eager to…

3 months ago