Defamation

What is Washington’s Anti-Slapp Law?

Washington’s new anti-SLAPP law, a version of the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, replaces its 2010 predecessor that was invalidated by the Supreme Court in 2015. The 2010 law was considered too aggressive and infringed on the state’s constitutional right to a jury trial. The new legislation, like its predecessor, aims to protect individuals against SLAPP suits that threaten their First Amendment rights.

Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs)

In order to understand what are anti-SLAPP laws, we must first answer what does ‘SLAPP’ stand for? SLAPP stands for Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). These are baseless lawsuits that seek to intimidate individuals against exercising their rights to freedom of expression. Costly litigation or threats of legal action are used to suppress public participation or silence speech on matters of public interest. Corporations and businesses may use a SLAPP suit to muzzle individuals or organizations who speak out, assemble, or petition the government on matters of public concern. The State of Washington, in an unprecedented move, was the first to enact anti-SLAPP legislation with the aim of deterring these problematic lawsuits.

For more information on states with anti-SLAPP laws, click here.

Scope of the New Anti-SLAPP Law

The new anti-SLAPP statute covers any anti-SLAPP lawsuit that is based on an individual’s:

  1. “Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding”
  2. Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding”
  3. Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or Washington State Constitution, on a matter of public concern”

The legislation exempts claims made against government employees or agents acting in an official capacity, insurance claims, claims related to common law fraud, and claims made under federal law, among others.

How the Anti-SLAPP Law Works

Individuals have a defense against defamation claims in the new statute that also provides a means to quickly and effectively dispose of groundless SLAPP lawsuits. Individuals targeted by a SLAPP lawsuit may counter claims by making a special motion for expedited relief. Motions must be filed within 60 days of that individual being served with a complaint. A defendant in a case must provide to a plaintiff written notice of their intent to file a motion at least 14 days before filing. The plaintiff, during that time, may withdraw or amend the complaint according to the requisite court rules.

The anti-SLAPP statute places a stay on all discovery, other hearings, and motions until a motion has been decided. A court may, however, allow limited discovery if a party can provide legitimate reasons for the court to do so. Barring any extenuating circumstances, a court shall hear a motion within 60 days of the filing of the motion and subsequently rule within 60 days of hearing the motion. Court decisions regarding a case are based on the pleadings, the motion, any reply or response to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in ruling on a motion for summary judgment”.

Success in a Motion for Expedited Relief

Winning a motion for expedited relief means that a court has dismissed a claim made against you, in whole or in part. Successful defendants are entitled to recover their attorney’s fees, legal fees related to the case, court costs, and a $10,000 damage award. As a byproduct of the case, a successful defendant may, in turn, sue a plaintiff for malicious prosecution.

Right to an Appeal

Having lost a case, the anti-SLAPP law allows a moving party to appeal an order denying a motion. Such appeals must be filed within 21 days of the entry of the order.

Secure Expert Representation in Your Defamation Case

Defamation cases are difficult to navigate and can leave your reputation tarnished. If you are involved in a defamation case, contact us at RM Warner Law. Allow our knowledgeable attorneys who are experienced in defamation and other legal matters to provide expert and early representation for you. Speak with one of our internet lawyers online today or call us toll-free at 1-866-570-8585 to discuss your case.

Raees Mohamed

Raees is a Founding Partner at RM Warner PLC, a corporate and Internet Law firm that caters to startups and entrepreneurs. He is also an adjunct professor of law in the acclaimed Innovation Advancement Program legal clinic at the Sandra Day O’Connor College Of Law in Phoenix. There, he teaches law students how to counsel local entrepreneurs as Rule 39 certified student-practitioners. Raees believes the push for the advancement of innovation and a culture of entrepreneurship should come from academic institutions.

Recent Posts

Defamation in the Digital Age: Legal Insights from RM Warner

On the internet, where perception is reality, defamation poses a significant threat to individuals and…

3 weeks ago

E-commerce Compliance: How RM Warner Ensures Legal Safety

The internet has opened up opportunities for business owners, marketers, influencers, and content creators alike.…

3 weeks ago

Is Sean Combs the Rap Industry Jeffrey Epstein?

How did Diddy get famous? Sean “Diddy” Combs started out as an ambitious radio station…

1 month ago

The Role of an E-commerce Lawyer in Today’s Digital Marketplace

These days, the rapid growth of online marketplaces means many entrepreneurs opt to use e-commerce…

1 month ago

Combatting Defamation: Legal Strategies from RM Warner

Reputation is everything in the business world. A single false statement or malicious rumor can…

1 month ago

Internet-Based Startups: Legal Best Practices with Insights from Internet Lawyers

Starting an online business can be exciting. As an e-commerce entrepreneur, you are eager to…

3 months ago