• Home
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Call Toll Free 1-866-570-8585

Find An Office Near You
Speak With an Internet Lawyer Now
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes

Home » Defamation » Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes
Big Tech Logos | RM Warner Law

Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes

November 6, 2020 Posted by Daniel Warner Defamation, Internet Law, Social Media Law 5 Comments

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a statute that grants immunity from liability to websites, social media platforms, and search engines for user generated content. This law was created back in 1996, before platforms like Facebook and Twitter were as influential as they are today. It’s no secret that misinformation and defamatory content are huge issues online so now, the Department of Justice and the Trump Administration are looking to reform the law in order to promote transparency and open discourse in an attempt to address illicit activity online.

Tech CEOS are at Odds About Section 230 Change

You could probably already guess that tech CEOs are against this change. In fact, on Tuesday, October 27th, 2020, Google and Twitter released prepared remarks warning against the proposed changes, while Facebook took the opposite approach by asking for more government regulation.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey argues that “Section 230 has allowed small companies to scale up to compete against established, global companies and eroding it could destroy how we communicate online. He says only the largest, well-funded tech companies will survive,” according to NBC. Dorsey also argued that weakening or removing Section 230 would promote more speech removal, and limit the network’s availably to address harmful content.

Tech CEOs aside though, both sides of the political spectrum are concerned with how social media networks and tech companies moderate user generated content.

The Struggle Moderating Content On Social Media Platforms

In October of 2020, Twitter blocked a link to a New York post article that claimed to contain “dirt” on presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son. At the time, Twitter removed it before it was verified and received backlash from conservatives who believe it was wrong to block the story ahead of its fact check, claiming it may be a form of election interference.

Dorsey later apologized for blocking the story in a tweet, stating, “Straight blocking of URLs was wrong, and we updated our policy and enforcement to fix. Our goal is to attempt to add context, and now we have capabilities to do that.”

Straight blocking of URLs was wrong, and we updated our policy and enforcement to fix. Our goal is to attempt to add context, and now we have capabilities to do that. https://t.co/ZLUw3YD887

— jack (@jack) October 16, 2020

Zuckerberg Promotes Section 230 Change

As stated earlier, and to the surprise of many, Mark Zuckerberg believes Section 230 should be changed.

“The debate about Section 230 shows that people of all political persuasions are unhappy with the status quo. People want to know that companies are taking responsibility for combatting harmful content — especially illegal activity — on their platforms. They want to know that when platforms remove content, they are doing so fairly and transparently. And they want to make sure that platforms are held accountable,” Zuckerberg said, “Changing it is a significant decision. However, I believe Congress should update the law to make sure it’s working as intended.”

Many find it troubling though that these tech giants essentially get to choose whether certain posts are taken down. As many are aware, each social media platform has their own political biases and beliefs. As attorneys, we also find it troubling that social media platforms are not required to remove defamatory content – especially if it is found to be defamation in a court of law. However, the proposed changes to Section 230 may benefit defamation victims as one of the “carve-outs” include removing content that is illegal, and speaks to defamation specifically.

No decisions have been made yet, but if there are any, it will likely depend on the result of the upcoming election as President Trump has been pushing for this change for years.

Trump Signs Section 230 Executive Order 

President Donald Trump released an executive order in May of 2020 regarding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This order aims to limit the legal protections Section 230 offers internet platforms, and requests that companies engaging in “unfair or deceptive” practices be investigated. It also asks that agencies collect complaints of political bias so, if the time comes, that evidence can be used to determine whether a site’s legal protections should be revoked.

Since the release of this executive order, Congress has given no sign that they plan to repeal Section 230 entirely, but many Congress members are now considering how else this act could be reformed for the better.

Looking for a Defamation Lawyer?

If you need legal counsel to help remove defamatory content, get in contact with one of our experienced defamation attorneys today. It’s our reputation to restore yours.

Tags: big techcdadefamationinternet lawsection 230
5 Comments
Share
2

About Daniel Warner

As a partner at RM Warner, Daniel focuses the majority of his practice on litigating cases involving Internet defamation, false and misleading advertising/marketing, unfair competition and cyber harassment. Although based in Arizona, Dan Warner has litigated Internet defamation cases in California, Texas, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New York, Georgia, North Carolina and Florida, as well as numerous cases in Arizona. Mr. Warner also works on various contractual, commercial, business, real estate, Internet and Internet marketing matters.

You also might be interested in

lone microphone | RM Warner Internet Law Firm | Facebook | Raees Mohamed | Daniel Warner | Daniel R Warner

Facebook & The “F-Word”: Free Speech

Apr 15, 2019

What is a Public Forum? When the founding fathers first[...]

pizza and ingredients | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Papa John’s Saucy Corporate Takeover Issues

Apr 11, 2019

You’ve all heard of Papa John’s, one of the world’s[...]

facebook censorship | RM Warner Internet Law Firm | free speech | Daniel Warner | Raees Mohamed

Free Speech vs. Government Censorship

Apr 18, 2019

The Internet and the First Amendment are in a constant[...]

5 Comments

Leave your reply.
  • nancy.toomer@yahoo.com' movie download
    · Reply

    February 2, 2021 at 12:14 AM

    I really like your writing style, superb information, appreciate it for putting up : D. Barbie Gannie Stanislaus

  • ohio_mommy@yahoo.com' dublaj
    · Reply

    February 2, 2021 at 2:50 AM

    Having read this I believed it was rather enlightening. I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put this content together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile! Madelena Ozzie Konstanze

  • mltshell10@yahoo.com' bluray
    · Reply

    February 7, 2021 at 8:39 PM

    I was able to find good information from your blog articles. Sibbie Butch Selry

  • samsongilbert@gmail.com' diziler
    · Reply

    February 8, 2021 at 2:23 PM

    I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found anything that grabbed my interest as much as this piece. Arabele Igor Gerkman

  • scoobydoo911_1980@yahoo.com' dizi
    · Reply

    February 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM

    Great delivery. Outstanding arguments. Keep up the great effort. Dorris Bartlett Ku

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • What Are the 7 Types of E-Commerce?
  • How Do You Win a Defamation Lawsuit?
  • The Ultimate Defamation Guide
  • How to Sue for Defamation
  • What Are the E-Commerce Regulations?

Recent Comments

  • Raees Mohamed on Cyberbullying Lawyer: How to Sue for Cyberbullying with Defamation Laws
  • Sylvia Richards on Cyberbullying Lawyer: How to Sue for Cyberbullying with Defamation Laws
  • WebDirectory on Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
  • Links.M106.COM on Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Ain’t Nuthin’ But a “G” Thang: Nicole Young Fights for the Intellectual Property Rights to Dr. Dre’s Name
  • Website directory on Can Jussie Smollett be Sued for Defamation?

Contact Us

Send us a message and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Speak With An Internet Lawyer Today Call Now
  • Defamation Law
  • Internet Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Ecommerce Law
  • Advertising Law
  • Social Media Law
Footer Icon PNG White | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

RM Warner Law is a Corporate and Internet Defamation Law Firm based in Scottsdale, Arizona. Our experienced Internet Lawyers have successfully represented hundreds of Entrepreneurs and E-commerce Law clients throughout the US and around the world.

Recent Posts

  • What Are the 7 Types of E-Commerce?
  • How Do You Win a Defamation Lawsuit?
  • The Ultimate Defamation Guide
  • How to Sue for Defamation
  • What Are the E-Commerce Regulations?

Tweets by RMWarnerLaw1

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Terms of Service

Social Icons Widget

  • RM Warner Law
  • 8283 N Hayden Rd Ste. 229, Scottsdale,
    AZ 85258, United States
  • 1-866-570-8585
  • 866-961-4984
  • admin@rmwarnerlaw.com

© 2020 — RM Warner Law

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Terms of Service
Prev Next