• Home
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Call Toll Free 1-866-570-8585

Find An Office Near You
Speak With an Internet Lawyer Now
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Facebook & The “F-Word”: Free Speech

Home » Internet Law » Facebook & The “F-Word”: Free Speech
lone microphone | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Facebook & The “F-Word”: Free Speech

April 15, 2019 Posted by Raees Mohamed Internet Law, Social Media Law No Comments

What is a Public Forum?

When the founding fathers first wrote the United States Constitution, do you think they could have ever imagined such a public forum as the Internet or social media? The legal definition of public forum is “a place that has a long-standing tradition of being used for, is historically associated with, or has been dedicated by government act to the free exercise of the right to speech and public debate and assembly.” So, technically, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter would not be considered a public forum by the government, but should they be? Or more interestingly, have they become public forums for purposes of internet defamation and free speech considerations?

The Public Forum Debate

In 2017, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, compared the Internet to a public forum in an opinion regarding the First Amendment case, Packingham v. North Carolina.

“While in the past there may have been difficulty in identifying the most important places (in a spatial sense) for the exchange of views, today the answer is clear. It is cyberspace—the “vast democratic forums of the Internet…” Kennedy wrote in his opinion to the court.

This insight from Justice Kennedy raises questions about how social media and the Internet should be treated as far as the government is concerned. It’s hard though, to fully address and act upon these questions and concerns because the government does not provide or own any of these social media sites.

Free Speech and Social Media

Facebook, a publicly-traded company, founded by Mark Zuckerberg, is one of the most widely used and powerful vehicles for spreading messages in the modern Internet era. Instagram, also owned by Facebook, is a part of the everyday lives of the younger generations known as the millennials and Generation Z. Recently, it has become the focus for businesses to better market to this younger audience as well as a way for Facebook to further its fortune, by collecting more personalize data and subsidizing their platform with paid ads. Instagram’s new “Checkout” in-app shopping feature is projected to make the company $10 billion, according to an article by CNBC.

Twitter, another publicly-traded social media platform, has become known to billions of its users as a fast and easy way to communicate messages all over the world. Twitter is also used widely to spread hate speech and controversy in addition to political messages and updates… just ask President Trump.

Seeing as how public and popular of a forum these social media platforms are, how does the government plan to regulate its power? Well, according to the First Amendment, it can’t. Unless they plan to amend the constitution, the regulation of these websites is not really possible.

In a way, this is a good thing because it upholds our First Amendment right to free speech. On the other hand, it opens the door for harmful material to be uploaded to a much wider audience than ever before, in an uncontrollable manner.

Free Speech Limitations or Public Protection?

Recently, Mark Zuckerberg has addressed the issue of Facebook’s power when proposing internet regulations in four areas: harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data, and portability.

It’s surprising to see the inventor of such a wildly successful platform like Facebook, publicly addressing its flaws without force or governmental interference. In fact, it’s the opposite, because in one sense, it’s inviting the government to interfere.

During the 2016 Presidential Election, Facebook received backlash over how it handled the Russian interference with our elections. Many countries outside the U.S. also feel that the company’s policies on hate speech are not strict enough, compared to U.S. conservative lawmakers, who have accused Facebook of censorship and political bias, according to CNBC. It can’t possibly be both, strong in censorship but also permissive in allowing wildly uncontrolled content — can it?

For starters, Zuckerberg believes setting up independent bodies to set standards for what is considered to be terrorist propaganda and hate speech is a way that Facebook will be able to better regulate the content posted on the platform and determine what is prohibited. He also suggested that the government pass legislation to regulate political ads on the Internet, noting that Facebook has a difficult time determining when an ad should or shouldn’t be considered political.

This “independent body” is something that Facebook is already creating with governments outside the U.S., France is one of them. The body will review Facebook’s content regulation system to make sure it is effective.

“I also believe a common global framework — rather than regulation that varies significantly by country and state — will ensure that the internet does not get fractured, entrepreneurs can build products that serve everyone, and everyone gets the same protections,” said Zuckerberg in a statement posted by CNBC.

Suggesting a more standardized approach to the regulation of content on the platform could impact more than just Facebook. Other networking platforms, and even the Internet itself, could potentially be affected if legislation is passed.

Current Laws Regarding Free Speech on Social Media

Currently, defamation laws are in place to (allegedly) prevent harmful speech on the Internet from damaging reputations. Historically, defamation laws were sufficient to consider the pros and cons of preventing false and defamatory statements about a person from being used to damage a person’s reputation. However, with social media taking over as the go-to source for any and all “news”, the lines are now blurry.  Some argue that allowing platforms to decide what content gets removed is censorship that has no place in America. However, why should we tolerate or even allow social media platform unfettered discretion to display any and all speech, including the vilest, hateful, false and defamatory statements? Pair this issue with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and we have an even more complex issue with harmful content removal (a topic for a much deeper conversation, later).

If you have been defamed, harassed, or bullied on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or elsewhere on Internet, please contact the defamation attorneys at RM Warner Law. We can help to restore your reputation. Explore the rest of our site to learn more.

Tags: facebookfacebook lawfirst amendmentfree speechinternet law
No Comments
Share
3

About Raees Mohamed

Raees is a Founding Partner at RM Warner PLC, a corporate and Internet Law firm that caters to startups and entrepreneurs. He is also an adjunct professor of law in the acclaimed Innovation Advancement Program legal clinic at the Sandra Day O’Connor College Of Law in Phoenix. There, he teaches law students how to counsel local entrepreneurs as Rule 39 certified student-practitioners. Raees believes the push for the advancement of innovation and a culture of entrepreneurship should come from academic institutions.

You also might be interested in

pizza and ingredients | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Papa John’s Saucy Corporate Takeover Issues

Apr 11, 2019

You’ve all heard of Papa John’s, one of the world’s[...]

facebook censorship | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Free Speech vs. Government Censorship

Apr 18, 2019

The Internet and the First Amendment are in a constant[...]

girls standing in a circle looking at social media on their phones | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

The Price of Privacy

Apr 20, 2019

When social media was first introduced, the world was excited[...]

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • 5 Essential Agreements Every E-Commerce Site Should Have
  • How to Copyright Your Software Idea: 4 Main Steps
  • 10 Reasons Why You Need a Start-Up Lawyer for Your Online Business
  • Anonymous Blogging and Defamation: Balancing Interests of the Internet
  • In Cases of Internet Defamation, Where Can You Sue?

Recent Comments

  • Raees Mohamed on Cyberbullying Lawyer: How to Sue for Cyberbullying with Defamation Laws
  • Sylvia Richards on Cyberbullying Lawyer: How to Sue for Cyberbullying with Defamation Laws
  • WebDirectory on Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
  • Links.M106.COM on Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Is Nothing But a “G” Thang: Soon-To-Be Ex-Wife Fights For the Intellectual Property Rights to His Name
  • Website directory on Can Jussie Smollett be Sued for Defamation?

Contact Us

Send us a message and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Speak With An Internet Lawyer Today Call Now
  • Defamation Law
  • Internet Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Ecommerce Law
  • Advertising Law
  • Social Media Law
Footer Icon PNG White | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Recent Posts

  • 5 Essential Agreements Every E-Commerce Site Should Have
  • How to Copyright Your Software Idea: 4 Main Steps
  • 10 Reasons Why You Need a Start-Up Lawyer for Your Online Business
  • Anonymous Blogging and Defamation: Balancing Interests of the Internet
  • In Cases of Internet Defamation, Where Can You Sue?

Tweets by RMWarnerLaw1

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Terms of Service

Social Icons Widget

  • RM Warner Law
  • 8283 N Hayden Rd Ste. 229, Scottsdale,
    AZ 85258, United States
  • 1-866-570-8585
  • 866-961-4984
  • admin@rmwarnerlaw.com

© 2020 — RM Warner Law

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Terms of Service
Prev Next