• Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Call Toll Free 1-866-570-8585

Find An Office Near You
Speak With an Internet Lawyer Now
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Nicholas Sparks Sued for Defamation: Final Verdict

Nicholas Sparks Sued for Defamation: Final Verdict

August 22, 2019 Posted by Daniel Warner Defamation No Comments

Sparks were not flying in court on Wednesday, August 14th, 2019,  as novelist Nicholas Sparks took the stand during trial for a defamation lawsuit filed against him by the former headmaster of a private Christian school. Epiphany School, located in North Carolina, was founded by Sparks. The former headmaster, Saul Benjamin, claims that Sparks told Epiphany School parents and others that Benjamin suffered from mental illness, according to WRAL.Com. 

Benjamin’s lawsuit alleges that he was forced out of his headmaster position because Sparks and members of the school board didn’t agree with his views on diversity.

Benjamin held the position for less than five months and claims that he became concerned with the school’s lack of diversity as soon as he took the position. He addressed these concerns with Sparks in a series of email exchanges. Some of Benjamin’s concerns included the lack of African-American students in the student body as well the bullying of gay students. 

Benjamin alleges that Sparks disagreed and did not like his idea of creating a support group for students, according to WRAL.Com. 

In a quote published by WRAL.Com, Benjamin’s attorney said, “There is an extensive record of emails in this case – many, if not most, of which were written by Nicholas Sparks himself – and we think they paint a contrasting picture to a lot of his other writings.” 

Not only does Benjamin claim that Sparks defamed him by telling people he has a mental illness, he also claims that he is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ADA is a civil rights law that protects Americans with disabilities against discrimination in all areas of public life, including jobs. 

So, should Sparks prepare himself for a tragedy or hold out hope that love [stories] always win? 

In order to win a defamation lawsuit in North Carolina, “plaintiffs must allege and prove that the defendant made false, defamatory statements of or concerning the plaintiff, which were published to a third person, causing injury to the plaintiff’s reputation.” [Tyson v. L’eggs Products, Inc., 84 N.C.App. 1, 10–11, 351 S.E.2d 834, 840 (1987)]

Now, here’s where this case gets tricky. Benjamin would need to prove that Sparks was lying when he told people that Benjamin had a mental illness. This might be difficult because Benjamin is also claiming that Sparks is in violation of the ADA. If Benjamin does have a mental illness, he may not be able to prove Sparks defamed him because technically that statement would be true. Truth is an absolute defense for defamation claims (Holleman v. Aiken, 193 N.C.App. 484, 668 S.E.2d 579 (2008). Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper, 211 N.C. App. 469, 478, 710 S.E.2d 309, 317 (2011))

This case is expected to last until next Wednesday, August 21st, 2019, according to WRAL.Com. Stay tuned for details. 

[UPDATE]: On Wednesday August 21st 2019, a jury sided with Nicholas Sparks on all counts of defamation. 

In a quote published by ABC11, Sparks said after the verdict, “I am grateful for the jury’s verdict in favor of myself, the Epiphany School and the Nicholas Sparks Foundation. The verdict speaks volumes, and completely rejects the campaign waged by Mr. Benjamin and his lawyers in an attempt to discredit Epiphany and me. As my testimony made clear, I have always been personally supportive of gay rights, gay marriage, and gay adoption. Further, Epiphany is and remains a place where students and faculty of any race, belief, religion, background, or orientation should feel welcome. My commitment to these values, as well as Epiphany’s commitment to these values, have been and remain constant. I look forward to getting back to writing full time, and I thank my family, friends, and readers for their support.”

ABC11 also reports that Sparks claims Benjamin voluntarily chose to resign, instead of being terminated, as the lawsuit claims. 

Benjamin and his legal team plan to look into appealing this decision, according to ABC11. 

If you are a victim of Internet defamation, contact the experienced attorneys at RM Warner Law. We have helped restore the reputations of countless victims of Internet Defamation. Get In Contact Today. 

To learn more about what to do if you are defamed on the Internet, click here. 

Tags: celebrity defamationdefamationdefamation lawsuitdefamation lawyernicholas sparks
No Comments
0
Share

About Daniel Warner

As a partner at RM Warner, Daniel focuses the majority of his practice on litigating cases involving Internet defamation, false and misleading advertising/marketing, unfair competition and cyber harassment. Although based in Arizona, Dan Warner has litigated Internet defamation cases in California, Texas, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New York, Georgia, North Carolina and Florida, as well as numerous cases in Arizona. Mr. Warner also works on various contractual, commercial, business, real estate, Internet and Internet marketing matters.

You also might be interested in

The Chronicles of Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell: Underage-Girls, Sex-Trafficking, & Defamation

The Chronicles of Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell: Underage-Girls, Sex-Trafficking, & Defamation

Jul 13, 2019

Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy and successful money manager, who’s adamant[...]

Top Defamation Defenses

Top Defamation Defenses

Oct 4, 2019

Are you being sued for defamation? Searching for a solid[...]

Mass Shootings in The U.S.: Who is to Blame? 8Chan, Social Media, Video Games, or The Communications Decency Act?

Mass Shootings in The U.S.: Who is to Blame? 8Chan, Social Media, Video Games, or The Communications Decency Act?

Aug 14, 2019

On Saturday, August 3rd, 2019, a gunman stormed into an[...]

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
  • Cardi B Tattoo Trademark Trouble
  • Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Is Nothing But a “G” Thang: Soon-To-Be Ex-Wife Fights For the Intellectual Property Rights to His Name
  • Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes
  • Going Viral, Gone Bad: What Do You Do If Defamation Goes Viral?

Recent Comments

    Tag Cloud

    ad law advertising law airbnb amazon law amazon lawyer anonymous defamation business law business lawyer celebrity defamation corporate lawyer corporate takeover cyberbullying cyberbullying lawyer defamation defamation lawsuit defamation lawyer ecommerce ecommerce law ecommerce lawyer esports esports law esports lawsuit esports lawyer facebook facebook law facebook lawyer fake news fake reviews faze clan fba first amendment free speech influencer lawyer influencer marketing intellectual property internet law internet lawyer law day 2019 marketing law revenge porn sextortion shareholder dispute social media law social media lawyer twitter lawsuit

    Contact Us

    Send us a message and we'll get back to you, asap.

    Send Message
    Speak With An Internet Lawyer Today Call Now
    • RM Warner Law
    • 1-866-570-8585
    • 866-961-4984
    • admin@rmwarnerlaw.com

    Recent Posts

    • Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
    • Cardi B Tattoo Trademark Trouble
    • Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Is Nothing But a “G” Thang: Soon-To-Be Ex-Wife Fights For the Intellectual Property Rights to His Name
    • Section 230 Reform – Why Tech CEO’s Are Against The Trump Administration’s Proposed Changes
    Tweets by RMWarnerLaw1
    • RM Warner Instagram
    • Payments
    • Blog
    • Privacy Policy

    © 2020 — RM Warner Law

    • RM Warner Instagram
    • Payments
    • Blog
    • Privacy Policy
    Prev Next