• Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Call Toll Free 1-866-570-8585

Find An Office Near You
Speak With an Internet Lawyer Now
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Deleting Violent Acts Caught on Camera from U.S. Websites

Deleting Violent Acts Caught on Camera from U.S. Websites

May 3, 2019 Posted by Daniel Warner Internet Law, Cyberbullying, Social Media Law No Comments

The speed and vastness of the internet is something that society struggles to control. When violent events like terrorist attacks and school shootings occur, the power of smartphone cameras make it possible for videos of violence to appear on social media within seconds, uploading for the whole world to see and shared by a myriad of news outlets. Some of this content is disturbing to most and many argue that it could incite others to commit similar acts.

Recently, an anti-semitic open letter was uploaded to a far-right message board known as 8chan. Hours later, a man opened fire at a synagogue in Poway, California near San Diego on the last day of passover. One person was killed and three were injured. After the shooting, John T. Earnest was taken into custody as a suspect. The user who posted the white nationalist open letter on 8chan used the username, “JohnTEarnest”, according to NBC News.

Along with the 8chan note was a link to a Facebook Page with a message that read “a livestream will begin shortly” and included a link of songs that the user planned to play during the livestream, according to NBC News.

A month before the Poway synagogue shooting, a shooting occurred at Christchurch Mosque in New Zealand, killing at least 49 people, according to BBC News. The shooting was also live streamed, and posted on social media platforms.

Six month ago (to the day of the Poway shooting), an anti-semitic white nationalist, Robert Bowers, opened fire at a synagogue in Pittsburgh, killing 11 people, according to The New York Times.

Interestingly enough, these three attacks all have something in common. The shooters used extremist forums, two of whom used 8chan, to post messages of notice, including clear motives and evidence. Even worse, the Poway shooter cited the Christchurch and Pittsburgh shootings as motivations, according to The Atlantic, making it highly plausible that he might be a copycat.

When you consider this information and the influence the internet can have on violence, what is the solution? How and when do these violent acts caught on camera get removed from U.S. websites? Who should be held accountable?

Well, according to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” This means that those who own and manage social media websites are not responsible for the content uploaded to their platforms. This means they can’t be sued if a user posts naked photos of their ex-girlfriend or videos of a violent shooting.

Platforms like Facebook and Youtube have policies that prohibit certain types of gruesome and hateful content from being uploaded, but in reality, these policies only go in effect until after the content is already uploaded and could even take days before it’s removed.

Major social networks have taken steps to police content in response to public outcry but given the vast population using these platforms, it’s almost impossible to manage.  

However, recently, YouTube has been more vigilant about removing suspected “terrorists videos” from their platform this year. Engadget reports that in the first three months of 2019, Google (who owns Youtube) manually removed more than a million videos that they suspected to be associated with terrorism, 90,000 of which were found to be in violation of YouTube’s Terrorist Policy. While it is noble of Google to take the time and money to manually remove these videos, it also is alarming that over a million videos posted to their platform, are associated or have the potential to be associated with terrorism.

“Google, Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft have been asked to reveal their counter terrorism budgets, but putting a number on that proves to be complex. The “hundreds of millions of dollars” estimate from Google is the closest thing to an answer that we’ve seen so far,” Engadget reports.

It’s clear that social media and the Internet have become a powerful weapon for criminals to promote hate crimes and acts of terrorism. Anti-Semitic acts of violence in particular have alarmingly increased in recent years. In an Annual Report released by the Anti-Defamation League, the number of anti-semitic physical assaults in 2018 have more than doubled from 2017 and the single deadliest attack against the American Jewish community happened in the same year with the Pittsburgh shooting.

Removing violent, hate-speech, harassment, and defamation, from internet platforms is becoming a growing problem and is very, very difficult. The law has yet to catch-up with the issues plaguing our real-time, social media focused society.   

If you have been defamed, harassed, or bullied on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or elsewhere on Internet, please Contact the defamation attorneys at RM Warner Law. We can help to restore your reputation. Visit RMWarnerLaw.Com to learn more.

Tags: cyberbullyingcyberbullying lawyerfacebook lawfacebook lawyerfree speechinternet lawinternet lawyersocial media lawsocial media lawyer
No Comments
2
Share

About Daniel Warner

As a partner at RM Warner, Daniel focuses the majority of his practice on litigating cases involving Internet defamation, false and misleading advertising/marketing, unfair competition and cyber harassment. Although based in Arizona, Dan Warner has litigated Internet defamation cases in California, Texas, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New York, Georgia, North Carolina and Florida, as well as numerous cases in Arizona. Mr. Warner also works on various contractual, commercial, business, real estate, Internet and Internet marketing matters.

You also might be interested in

Facebook & The “F-Word”: Free Speech

Facebook & The “F-Word”: Free Speech

Apr 15, 2019

When the founding fathers first wrote the United States Constitution,[...]

Papa John’s Saucy Corporate Takeover Issues

Papa John’s Saucy Corporate Takeover Issues

Apr 11, 2019

You’ve all heard of Papa John’s, one of the world’s[...]

Free Speech vs. Government Censorship

Free Speech vs. Government Censorship

Apr 18, 2019

The Internet and the First Amendment are in a constant[...]

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • Anti-SLAPP Laws (Statutes) Explained By A Defamation Lawyer – Anti-SLAPP Laws Can Help Get A Defamation Lawsuit Against You Dismissed
  • A Defamation Lawyer For Lawyers
  • Top Five Things Every E-Commerce Entrepreneur Needs To Know
  • Timeline of Britney Spears’ Conservatorship Battle
  • How Do I Sue An Anonymous User or Website for Defamation or Copyright Infringement? John Doe Lawsuits Explained…

Recent Comments

  • Raees Mohamed on Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
  • shay sv on Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?

Tag Cloud

ad law advertising law airbnb amazon law amazon lawyer anonymous defamation anti-slapp anti-slapp law britney spears business law business lawyer celebrity defamation cyberbullying cyberbullying lawyer defamation defamation lawsuit defamation lawyer ecommerce ecommerce law ecommerce lawyer esports esports law esports lawsuit esports lawyer facebook facebook law facebook lawyer fake news fake reviews fba first amendment free speech influencer lawyer influencer marketing intellectual property internet law internet lawyer law day 2019 marketing law revenge porn sextortion shareholder dispute social media law social media lawyer twitter lawsuit

Contact Us

Send us a message and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Speak With An Internet Lawyer Today Call Now
  • RM Warner Law
  • 1-866-570-8585
  • 866-961-4984
  • admin@rmwarnerlaw.com

Recent Posts

  • Anti-SLAPP Laws (Statutes) Explained By A Defamation Lawyer – Anti-SLAPP Laws Can Help Get A Defamation Lawsuit Against You Dismissed
  • A Defamation Lawyer For Lawyers
  • Top Five Things Every E-Commerce Entrepreneur Needs To Know
  • Timeline of Britney Spears’ Conservatorship Battle
Tweets by RMWarnerLaw1
  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

© 2020 — RM Warner Law

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
Prev Next