• Home
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us

Call Toll Free 1-866-570-8585

Find An Office Near You
Speak With an Internet Lawyer Now
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
RM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law FirmRM Warner Law | Online, Marketing, Internet Business Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Defamation Law
    • Internet Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Ecommerce Law
    • Advertising Law
    • Social Media Law
  • Internet Law Blog
  • Contact Us
upset man looking at bad review on ripoff report | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Ripoff Report Removal: “VIP Arbitration Rules” Established For Defamation on Ripoff Report

September 19, 2019 Posted by Daniel Warner Advertising Law, Business Law, Defamation, Internet Law No Comments

Ripoff Report is a consumer review website that houses millions of “reports” or reviews summarizing customer experiences with specific companies. As you can tell by the name, these reviews aren’t exactly positive. In fact, many of these reports have ruined the reputations of hundreds, if not thousands, of businesses. If you have been posted about and need to remove content from Ripoff Report, here are some tips on what you need to know.

what is defamatory review criteria

Can Businesses Have Negative Reviews About Them Removed From RipOff Report?

In the past, Ripoff report was notorious for refusing to remove reports, even if they were defamatory. This made the company’s strict “no removal” policy a hot topic of debate in the business community for years. If a business sought to restore its reputation, the only option Ripoff Report welcomed was a rebuttal, oftentimes resulting in an online debate that caused even more negative attention.

And I know what you’re thinking, “Isn’t defamation against the law?” Yes, it is, but it’s also important to understand that federal and state laws support Ripoff Report’s removal policy. Specifically, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provide online platforms with immunity from liability for content that is user generated. There are few exceptions to this federal law, which means Ripoff Report has no incentive to remove content posted by a user. In fact, user generated content usually helps websites to generate traffic. However, recently, Ripoff Report decided to offer an alternative for dealing with false reports.

Did RipOff Report Change its Removal Policy?

As of June 2018, Ripoff Report has established “VIP Arbitration Rules” which, in simple terms, is a very specific process where individuals can seek review of statements posted on the website that they believe to be false. The process is not much different than how any private arbitration process would work. They use an independent arbiter so they don’t have to make decisions regarding arbitration rulings themselves. They usually hire a retired judge, or experience lawyer to review the evidence submitted, and to make a decision. This is why it’s important that you have a lawyer involved that understands Ripoff Report’s removal procedures, and can build up your arbitration case.

If arbitrators find that statements written on the website are indeed false, Ripoff Report will post a notice stating, “Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of fact. The false statements have been redacted” followed by a summary of the arbitrator’s decision.

Defamation on RipOff Report

Will RipOff Report Remove Defamatory Posts?

The website still will not remove the original content of the report, even if the report was found to be true or false. It will only post the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision before the original report, if it is found to be false.

However, if the website receives a court order claiming that statements in a report are libelous or defamatory, they may choose to “redact the information specifically identified as false” but only under extreme circumstances. Their redaction process usually means covering the statements found to be defamatory with the “#” symbol. In some cases, Ripoff Report may, but is not required to, redact the URL of the post.

On the bright side, we do have proof that the site will (under limited circumstances) remove certain content. This is because the attorneys at RM Warner Law have obtained a favorable result for a client dealing with a defamatory report.

Attorneys at RM Warner Law have obtained favorable results for a client who was dealing with a defamatory post. Results always vary, and we cannot guarantee any results, or that you will have a similar experience.

“We had a client that was being harassed, non-stop, on Ripoff Report. We exhausted almost all judicial remedies we possibly could, including obtaining a court order finding the content false and defamatory. Finally, Ripoff Report read the court orders, and after hearing our client’s perspective on the harassment, redacted all of the false and defamatory content – including the URL itself. This was an amazing, and rare result. But it literally took our client out of a downward spiral of depression.”

Mandatory Court Order for Removal of Defamatory Content

Although this change is a step in the right direction for businesses fallen victim to defamation, this policy only applies to those who have taken their case to court, and have obtained a judgment. Both sides have to present arguments and the court has to rule against the author who posted the report before Ripoff Report will even consider removing content. This process can be difficult, because it requires a court order to be entered against the defendant.

Speak to a Defamation Lawyer

Is your business suffering because of a false and defamatory review posted to Ripoff Report? The attorneys at RM Warner Law have worked with hundreds of businesses to alleviate the negative effects of defamatory online consumer reviews. If you’re a victim, contact our Ripoffreport.Com removal attorneys; they’ll be able to review the specifics of your situation and depending on the circumstances, may be able help restore your reputation.

Tags: defamationdefamation lawsuitfake reviewreview removalripoff report
No Comments
Share
0

About Daniel Warner

As a partner at RM Warner, Daniel focuses the majority of his practice on litigating cases involving Internet defamation, false and misleading advertising/marketing, unfair competition and cyber harassment. Although based in Arizona, Dan Warner has litigated Internet defamation cases in California, Texas, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New York, Georgia, North Carolina and Florida, as well as numerous cases in Arizona. Mr. Warner also works on various contractual, commercial, business, real estate, Internet and Internet marketing matters.

You also might be interested in

judge hitting wooden gavel | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Can Jussie Smollett be Sued for Defamation?

May 4, 2019

If you’ve been paying attention to the news recently, you’ve[...]

girl crying next to computer | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Sextortion Targets College Students in Idaho

May 8, 2019

Have you ever received a friend request or direct message[...]

michael jackson getting out of car | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Michael Jackson Estate Sues HBO for $100 Million Over “Leaving Neverland”

May 10, 2019

The life, career, and death of Michael Jackson has had[...]

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • 5 Essential Agreements Every E-Commerce Site Should Have
  • How to Copyright Your Software Idea: 4 Main Steps
  • 10 Reasons Why You Need a Start-Up Lawyer for Your Online Business
  • Anonymous Blogging and Defamation: Balancing Interests of the Internet
  • In Cases of Internet Defamation, Where Can You Sue?

Recent Comments

  • Raees Mohamed on Cyberbullying Lawyer: How to Sue for Cyberbullying with Defamation Laws
  • Sylvia Richards on Cyberbullying Lawyer: How to Sue for Cyberbullying with Defamation Laws
  • WebDirectory on Can I Sue Someone For Leaking My ‘OnlyFans’ Content?
  • Links.M106.COM on Dr. Dre’s Divorce Battle Is Nothing But a “G” Thang: Soon-To-Be Ex-Wife Fights For the Intellectual Property Rights to His Name
  • Website directory on Can Jussie Smollett be Sued for Defamation?

Contact Us

Send us a message and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Speak With An Internet Lawyer Today Call Now
  • Defamation Law
  • Internet Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Ecommerce Law
  • Advertising Law
  • Social Media Law
Footer Icon PNG White | RM Warner Inernet Law Firm

Recent Posts

  • 5 Essential Agreements Every E-Commerce Site Should Have
  • How to Copyright Your Software Idea: 4 Main Steps
  • 10 Reasons Why You Need a Start-Up Lawyer for Your Online Business
  • Anonymous Blogging and Defamation: Balancing Interests of the Internet
  • In Cases of Internet Defamation, Where Can You Sue?

Tweets by RMWarnerLaw1

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Terms of Service

Social Icons Widget

  • RM Warner Law
  • 8283 N Hayden Rd Ste. 229, Scottsdale,
    AZ 85258, United States
  • 1-866-570-8585
  • 866-961-4984
  • admin@rmwarnerlaw.com

© 2020 — RM Warner Law

  • RM Warner Instagram
  • Blog
  • Terms of Service
Prev Next